[aprssig] Object Timestamps and 111111
Tapio Sokura
oh2kku at iki.fi
Sun Dec 12 10:26:19 EST 2010
Hi,
On 12.12.2010 16:58, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote:
> Any pointers to the definition of the timestamp on object packets,
> especially the spec of the 111111 special value (which the newer
> Kenwoods appear to accept as a z, but not an h) and what it means.
Basically it means the 11th day of a month at 11:11 (am) or the time
11:11:11 (am), depending on whether it's followed by z or h. The pdf
spec doesn't treat it as a special value at all. I haven't gone through
Bob's APRS addendums, they might contain something more about this.
000000 has been used by some as the invalid timestamp format as well.
But I guess 111111 is nowadays preferred, because 111111 actually is a
valid timestamp, for both h and z. 000000z is not valid, because there
is no 0th day in a month. An APRS program that checks the validity of
the timestamp might throw the whole packet away, if the timestamp is
invalid.
The reason for using a seemingly valid, but in reality invalid
timestamps (like 111111h) is that not all object transmitters have a
realtime clock, and/or are not capable of transmitting packets that have
a changing content. A typical example of this is any regular TNC, whose
beacon text is used to transmit APRS objects. The item format would be
better suited for transmitting timestampless "objects", but I guess the
support for items in APRS software and devices is not as prevalent as
object support.
Tapio
More information about the aprssig
mailing list