[aprssig] WIDEn-N question My Summary
cap at cruzio.com
Wed Nov 4 19:28:49 EST 2009
Best routine (to help us all share our slow VHF channel) is to disregard any
recommendation for any three-hop digipath. Problem solved.
Remember, with so many IGates and fill-in digis today, most of us can well
meet the needs of our particular intended audience by routinely setting our
VHF transmitters to use a digipath of only WIDE1-1. Simply to suit our
audience's purposes, we may not even need to transmit our data quite so
frequently on VHF either! <grin>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On
> Behalf Of Steve Noskowicz
> Sent: Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:17 AM
> To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'; bruninga at usna.edu
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] WIDEn-N question My Summary
> Sorry 'bout that.
> Here is what I'm testing my understanding on:
> /nit flag on/
> I think this may be called an oxymoron - a (necessariyl) self
> conflicting standard.
> Though this is "recommended" for mobile 3-hop : WIDE1-1,WIDE2-2
More information about the aprssig