[aprssig] Universal APRS messaging
steve at dimse.com
Sun Oct 19 21:15:49 EDT 2008
On Oct 19, 2008, at 8:53 PM, Gregory A. Carter wrote:
> By your standards of "martarism" then every APRS software developer
> should just disable APRS Messaging altogether to protect iGate
> owners from liability.
No, because that would not protect them. You do not need an APRS
client, just a telnet program.
I don't think you should ban guns because they can be used for a
crime. I do think that anyone that buys one needs to be aware of the
consequences of owning one, especially the legal responsibility for
actions outside your control (e.g. your 5 year old kid gets ahold of
it and kills his friend). I believe that everyone in the chain, from
the gun designer to maufacture to shopowner to buyer shares
responsibility for the safe operation of that gun.
> As stated before, you cannot send a message from OpenAPRS...
No need to be defensive, I tried to make it very clear this is not
about OpenAPRS, I do not see any problems with your authentication
mechanism. I just think it is wasted effort, because the all that
effort funnels into a system that has zero security. The effort needs
to be in the infrastructure first.
> I fail to see how the level of control we have implimented threatens
> the remote iGate user. I'm content with agreeing to disagree with
> you and leaving it at that.
I wish you had read what I said "The fault is not with OpenAPRS, their
system is as good as one can expect from a verification system. The
problem is what follows." That is exactly what I meant. I can have the
greatest front door, deadbolts and locks ever made, but it is not much
use if there is no back wall to my house!
More information about the aprssig