[aprssig] APRS IS Issue ?

Earl Needham earl_needham at yahoo.com
Sun Mar 2 16:52:53 EST 2008

At 20:46 3/1/2008, Keith VE7GDH wrote:

>Rather than just keep increasing the maximum number of inbound 
>connections, it might be a good idea if the two remaining core 
>servers were to only accept connections from tier 2 servers, and 
>that the end users should connect to the tier 2 servers and spread 
>the load out instead of trying to connect to the core servers. That 
>will take a significant load off the core servers and let them get 
>on with the task of sharing the data to and from the tier 2 servers 
>instead of getting bogged down trying to serve the needs of the 
>individual end users.

         Going along with the above, would it be possible to add 
another "rotate" type address, using different servers?  I like to 
use rotate when I'm driving, so if I can't connect to a particular 
server, I can try another without having to stop the truck to get in 
the sleeper to do so.  The other option is to try and reach the 
laptop from the drivers seat, while at 70 MPH!

         7 3

KD5XB -- Earl Needham
Clovis, New Mexico DM84jk
Quoting from the Coast Guard: ZUT 

More information about the aprssig mailing list