[aprssig] Time to UPGRADE obsolete DIGIS!
John Ronan
jronan at tssg.org
Sun Jun 8 16:39:59 EDT 2008
On 8 Jun 2008, at 19:08, Jan T. Pharo wrote:
> "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga at usna.edu>, Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:54:01 -0400
> (EDT)
>
>> All "Traceable WIDEn-N" does is put WIDEn-N in the UITRACE
>> parameter so it is traceable and eliminate all other obsolete
>> paths. So still it does what the word means, makes all APRS
>> packets "traceable".
>
> Well, obviously, when one has a parameter word TRACE and a parameter
> word WIDE, it's only natural that the word WIDE is used when
> TRACE-able paths should be used. Of course.
> Just to think that the word TRACE should be used according to its word
> meaning is ridiculous, isn't it?
>
> now, seriously:
Before we get serious... what was wrong with using relayn-n? ;)
> However, when the region 1 recommendation eventually comes, we'll
> probably use it region-wide.
Well,
If there is knowledgeable, full and frank debate, then yeah...
--
John Ronan <jronan at tssg.org>, +353-51-302938
Telecommunications Software & Systems Group, http://www.tssg.org
More information about the aprssig
mailing list