[aprssig] The new D710 and Smart Beaconing?
scott at opentrac.org
scott at opentrac.org
Wed May 23 13:59:43 EDT 2007
I know the change is mostly a semantic one, but I thought it was important to make it a negative thing - that it'd drop beacons rather than adding them. The user can't blame the device for adding more frequent beacons than requested; the rate you specify is still the maximum rate.
Scott
N1VG
_____
From: Earl Needham via Kubuntu [mailto:needhame1 at plateautel.net]
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List [mailto:aprssig at lists.tapr.org]
Sent: Wed, 23 May 2007 10:43:09 -0700
Subject: Re: [aprssig] The new D710 and Smart Beaconing?
On Wednesday 23 May 2007 11:25:56 scott at opentrac.org wrote:
> The Tracker2 has a new feature I'd like to see more widely implemented -
> you can set it so that if it hears its own packet digipeated, it'll skip
> the next n transmissions. This means you can set a fairly high beacon rate
> to get a better success rate out in the middle of nowhere, but when you get
> into an area with better coverage it automatically cuts back on beacons.
The HamHUD had a similar feature some years ago. If it did NOT hear it's own
packet repeated, it would send it again. I believe it would send a total of
three of these before it gave up. I believe this feature was finally deleted
due to complaints of "over-beaconing".
7 3
Earl
KD5XB
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20070523/3a3c3a28/attachment.html>
More information about the aprssig
mailing list