[aprssig] New-N Paradigm Works!

[John Habbinga]

Can you identify any of the stations for us?

On 5/18/06, Stan - N0YXV <n0yxv at gihams.org> wrote:
>
> I haven't done a real study of packets in my area but from what I've seen
> you have a much larger success rate. While most of what I see in Nebraska
> is
> New-N a lot of the WIDE digis's south of me in Kansas, and Oklahoma are
> not.
> Small coverage Digi's are more likely to be New-N. I'm getting packets on
> a
> regualar basis from Texas that start WIDE7-7 or WIDE5-5. I've emailed
> several of them but I either get no responce, email bounced (because it's
> not correct on QRZ) or a lack of understanding of why Texas Packets in
> Nebraska aren't a good thing. Good news is that I haven't gotten any hate
> mail back. :-) Oh and by the way several of the Digi's (that I've seen)
> that
> have icon's claiming to be New-N Digi's simply aren't New-N.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20060519/d477f9f6/attachment.html>