[aprssig] PHG in APRS and Xastir?

[VE7GDH]

Bill WA7NWP wrote...

> > Given that we are "told" to fudge the PHG figures (I said)

> Isn't there an parallel 'range' field that gives another means of
> expressing the coverage of a station?

I was just looking at RNGrrrr in the spec a few minutes ago. I don't recall 
ever seeing it used. Perhaps RNGrrrr and the directivity that can be 
included with PHG would be more usable for DFing... in the absence of real 
DFing tools.

73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
--
"I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"