[aprssig] Re: WIDEn-N and the New Paradigm for UIDIGI
Robert Bruninga
bruninga at usna.edu
Mon May 16 09:47:15 EDT 2005
I see.
I guess when we get to 100% new-N implementation
in about 5 to 10 years (it does take that long for
some hams to do antyhing new), then I think this
is a good idea.
But for now, we need the WIDE2 on the end so
that we know what the packet *was*. If it arrives
as DIGI1,DIGI2, the existing rules imply this started
as a non-desired WIDE,WIDE. If we loose the
ability to tourbleshoot the net, we end up with an
unmanageable mess. I far prefer the wasted 7 bytes
at least until we get to 100% of all digipeaters
having implemented the New-N and we can be certain
that no one is using the WIDE,WIDE path...
Bob
>>> henk.de.groot at hetnet.nl 5/16/2005 8:42:40 AM >>>
Hello Bob,
Robert Bruninga schreef:
> Actually THe extra 2 does not waste anything because
> in the AX.25 protocol those fields are 7 bytes no matter
> what the callsign. And My bet is it will take YEARS for
> all digis to switch over to the New-N paradigm. Bob
Bill drops the complete trailing WIDE2/WIDE2* at the last hop. So there
will be one complete VIA call less; this will save 7 bytes of data. I
think Bill's proposal makes sense since one can easily count te number
of
calls already replaced.
So with your previous remark I now have 2 options:
1) End the packet with a trailing WIDE2* like:
WB0ABC>APRS,KB0ABC*,N0ABC*,WIDE2*
or
2) End the packet without a trailing WIDE2* like:
WB0ABC>APRS,KB0ABC*,N0ABC*
In both cases any calls following the original WIDE2-N will be kept too
if
there are any, like NOGATE, RFONLY or maybe distribution directives
like
WORLD, LOCAL and IGATE, but also an additional WIDE2-2.
This detailed discussion may look a bit like nit-picking, but I want my
template to be okay since it will most likely be copied a lot without
adjusting a lot. So if my template is wrong, it is likey any error will
op
up everywere...
Kind regards,
Henk.
_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
More information about the aprssig
mailing list