[aprssig] Any more changes?

[Ron Stordahl]

Bruce et al

I am currently doing extensive study of UIDIGI characteristics re New-N. 
I have 9 of these running in the area and can directly hear 4 of them 
permitting me to test UIT/UIF/UID settings. Some of the findings are a 
bit surprising, however I do believe I will be able to present a 
recommended set which accomplishes the New-N as close as is possible 
without code changes. I will post my results, but I do not think this 
will be completed until May 13th.

Ron, N5IN

Bruce, KQ4TV wrote:

> I plan to spend 8-10 hours Friday going to each of the digis that I 
> manage and reprogram them to the New n-N Paradigm standards.
> I have two UIdigi and one KPC3 v8.2 digis. I need to burn the UIdigi 
> eproms Thursday afternoon.
> I burned an eprom and changed one digi only to have everything change 
> within days making the programming nearly obsolete though still 
> usable. I reprogrammed the KPC3 only to find out the next day that the 
> recommendations had changed and that digi became unusable.
>
> Are there any more changes being contemplated?
>
> I have a question concerning the UIdigi programming.
> How should the UIFLOODOptions parameter be set?
>
> // UIFLOOD Algorithm flag (default 0)
> // bit 0 make call substitution after the last WIDEn-n digied
> // bit 1 insert callsign before WIDEn-n
> // UIFLDfl [n]
> UIFLOODOptions = 1
>
>
>
> Bruce, KQ4TV
> -- 
> Bruce W. Martin, KQ4TV
> Trustee for NT4UX
> Nashville Linux User Group - Amateur Radio- Special Interest Group
> NLUG-AR-SIG
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig