[aprssig] 9600? Faster?
Curt, WE7U
archer at eskimo.com
Thu Jul 7 12:40:15 EDT 2005
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Scott Miller wrote:
> Would there be any improvement from running at 4800 baud? It's still 4
> times faster than the existing system, and shouldn't push the envelope as
> much as far as the radios are concerned. That's plenty of extra capacity
> for robust FEC.
While we're at it, would some other non-standard rate _between_ 4800
and 9600 work? What is the maximum rate we could get through
voice-grade rigs without modification, even if we have to change to
a different type of modulation?
There's no reason we have to stick to any standard rate over the
air. From the TNC to the computer, yes.
--
Curt, WE7U. APRS Client Comparisons: http://www.eskimo.com/~archer
"Lotto: A tax on people who are bad at math." -- unknown
"Windows: Microsoft's tax on computer illiterates." -- WE7U
"The world DOES revolve around me: I picked the coordinate system!"
More information about the aprssig
mailing list