[aprssig] IGate test needed

AE5PL Lists HamLists at ametx.com
Sat Jan 29 16:26:45 EST 2005


I agree, Tapio.  The "from" call should designate who (or what) is
inserting these packets into APRS.  These are really objects, not APRS
stations so they really should be inserted as objects, not APRS
stations.  Both the Winlink and EchoLink servers use objects.

73,

Pete Loveall AE5PL
mailto:pete at ae5pl.net 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tapio Sokura
> Posted At: Saturday, January 29, 2005 2:25 PM
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] IGate test needed
> 
> Robert Bruninga wrote:
> > 
> STN4090>APRS,qAO,IRLPGW:!4233.15NI07608.55W0PHG8760.442.850Mhz+71.9IDL
> > STN4090>E______kb2faf
> 
> Why is there a format like this anyway, why not use regular 
> objects? I for one would like to always see who is actually 
> originating the "objects" on the map, it is easy to see if 
> the callsign is there.




More information about the aprssig mailing list