[aprssig] GAAAAKKK!!! I bet Bob didn't intend THIS!

[Earl Needham]

         I'll do some digging Monday and see if I can verify this one way 
or the other.

         7 3
         Earl

At 02:23 PM 1/22/2005, Robert Bruninga wrote:
> >>> Earl Needham <needhame1 at plateautel.net> 01/22/05 11:01 AM >>>
> >...since Lubbock announced the end of WIDEn-N
> >and the start of TXLNKn-N.  I notice WTLNKn-N ...
> >coming from over there, too.
>
>
>ARGH!!!  Please tell me it isnt so.
>How in the world can they missinterpret the New n-N paradigm
>so badly!!!  If it is  a ##LNKn-N it *must* be a linear system.!
>
>If it is  STATEn-N system then it should be TXn-N or WTn-N
>but not TXLNKn-N!  That is just going to totally mess up the
>plan and for no good reason...
>
>The VALUE of the New n-N Paradigm is CONSISTENCY that
>will work everywhere.   Please lets not mess it up...
>
>de Wb4APR, Bob