PHG (was RE: [aprssig] Bob B statements)

[A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)]

Yes, I have used UI-PATH.  That is a top notch add-in.  We were able to
identify a "deaf" digi in our area using it.  We knew it wasn't performing
well, but it wasn't until I logged everything with UI-PATH for 48 hours that
we could really see what was happening.

If anyone is interested, here is an example of what UI-PATH output looks
like:

http://www.aj3u.com/aprs/digi-coverage.php

73!

A.J. Farmer, AJ3U
http://www.aj3u.com
 

-----Original Message-----
From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
On Behalf Of Keith - VE7GDH
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 12:36 PM
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: PHG (was RE: [aprssig] Bob B statements)

A.J. Farmer AJ3U wrote on 19/01/2005 9:19:05 AM PST

> What is the correct format for manually entering the PHG info into
UI-View?
> Should this go in the beacon comment or the status text?

You could put it in the beacon comment, but that will go out with every
single beacon. I put it in the status text and have it go out just ever 60
minutes.

PHG sounds good in theory, and I can understand how a circle shown on a map
could be used as a quick reference. If there was a PHG add-on for UI-View, I
would probably use it, but I think that UI-Path gives a pretty good analysis
of what the coverage is like in a given area. It's not PHG, but to me, it is
a bit more meaningful.

73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH
--
"I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig