[aprssig] Another Source of Network Overload ?? -- Super SUPERLAN
Bill Vodall
wa7nwp at jnos.org
Thu Jan 6 22:03:06 EST 2005
> I appreciate the innovation, but its a waste of time. As Jim
> points out 9600 baud one-packet at a time with TXdelays
> barely even doubles throughput.
I let it go once... 9600 with real 9600 radios is not going to be
using 500 millisecond TXdelays. There's no technical reason it can't
use 50 or even 5 milliseconds. The Kantronics D4-10 could do that
and it's something like 10 years old.
9600 done right is worth the effort. Try a real 9600 digital repeater someday and
you be amazed what can be done. FWIW - Editing with VI works at 9k6 on packet...
Not terribly responsive but it does work.
You want a SUPERLAN? Forget the 9k6 and UHF frequencies. Hook up a
simple 2.4 GHz WiFi card, write a simple program to dump the aprs-is
feed as UDP packets and run the output through a $80 Hawking HSB-1 1/2
watt amplier.
<http://reviews.cnet.com/Hawking_HSB1_Wireless_Signal_Booster/4514-6461_7-31126286.html>
Spend another $80 on a 10 db onmi and you're flooding the region with APRS data. Speed
is no longer an issue..
Bill - WA7NWP
More information about the aprssig
mailing list