[aprssig] time for APRS second generation network?

[Robert Bruninga]

Jason,

By the way, Iam not at all opposed to  you sugggestions
for a smarter infrastructure.  Dont get me wrong.
I am all for a 9600 baud RF backbone system say
with a state (or ARRL section) that makes a great
LAN boundary)...

Im just saying that we MUST fix this level 2 saturation
problem first.  and the smarter infrastructure cant do a
anything about that.  And I just want to un-confuse 
users.

The bottom line is we MUST cut path length and
high-digi coverage to get back to the ALOHA limit
and unsaturated channels.
And focus only on that effort or nothing else we do
has any possibility of success.

thanks
Bob