[aprssig] WinLink Stations on 144.39

[A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)]

I just recounted and still see 15 of them.  The question right now is
whether or not these are active TelPac nodes or if they are stale records in
the database.  Sometimes people set up nodes for testing and forget to
remove them from the database when they take them offline.  It's also
possible that there are some typo's like you said.  

The key thing is the people involved with the Winlink project are fully
aware of APRS so I'm sure they will address any problems.  Steve just asked
for anyone to let him know if they see a TelPac node that is active on
144.39.  He did mention that there has been at least one TelPac node that
did set up shop on 144.39, but it was quickly pounced upon.  With the amount
of airtime they require (connected mode), you would know if one was
operating. ;-)

A.J.



-----Original Message-----
From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Duncan
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 11:05 PM
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
Subject: Re: [aprssig] WinLink Stations on 144.39

I only noticed THREE stations listing 144.39. Is it possible that these 
are simply typing errors when the operator INTENDED to put in 144.93???



A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) wrote:

> I got a very quick reply from Steve, K4CJX.  He assured me that operation
of
> Winlink TelPac stations should not be happening on 144.39.  He's going to
> put out a reminder on the Winlink reflector to make sure that people know
> not to operate on 144.39.  If you are aware of a Winlink TelPac node
> operating in your area on 144.39, he asked that you notify him so that he
> can address it directly with the node operator.
> 
> 73!
> 
> A.J. Farmer, AJ3U
> http://www.aj3u.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A.J. Farmer (AJ3U) [mailto:ajfarmer at spenet.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 10:09 PM
> To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'
> Subject: RE: [aprssig] WinLink Stations on 144.39
> 
> I just sent a friendly e-mail to K4CJX about this.  He is listed as a
> primary contact on the Winlink website.  Hopefully he can help steer
Winlink
> users away from setting up on 144.39.
> 
> On a related note, it sure would be handy to have Winlink node objects
> available on APRS just like what is being done for IRLP and Echolink
nodes.
> I believe this was discussed a while back.  I also mentioned this in my
> e-mail to K4CJX for what it is worth.
> 
> Imagine arriving in a new area and seeing local IRLP, Echolink, and
Winlink
> node objects on your APRS map.  Now that is useful!!
> 
> A.J. Farmer, AJ3U
> http://www.aj3u.com
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
[mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]
> On Behalf Of A.J. Farmer (AJ3U)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 9:47 PM
> To: 'TAPR APRS Mailing List'
> Subject: [aprssig] WinLink Stations on 144.39
> 
> I made a disurbing discovery today.  There are 15 registered WinLink nodes
> operating on 144.39:
> 
> http://www.winlink.org/status/TelpacEx.aspx
> 
> I found this out by accident when searching for a local node and found one
> registered on 144.39!!
> 
> A.J. Farmer, AJ3U
> http://www.aj3u.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> 

-- 
73 de Jim, KU0G


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at lists.tapr.org
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig