[aprssig] Finito

[Cap Pennell]

I think Earl's problem direction is ESE to Lubbock, TX.
But even most of the updated Kantronics digis won't handle the second hop of
that "fill-in SSn" path properly, although they will handle the second hops
of the "fill-in WIDEn-N" properly.  So, better than NM1-1,NM7-7 would be
plain NM7-7. <grin>
For Users
Fixed non-moving: WIDE2-2
Mobile, moving:   WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1
Blanket N.Mexico: NM4-4

73, Cap

> -----Original Message-----
> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Bill WA7NWP
> Sent: Saturday, August 27, 2005 00:01 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Finito
>
>
>
> >         I've been trying for YEARS to explain that the same solution
> > won't work for the entire country and every time I do, you people skip
>
> Maybe you're missing half the solution of the new paradigm?
>
> WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1 will work "ok" every where and won't hurt anywhere.
> That's the lowest common path that makes for an acceptable standard.
>
> For your area with it's low population, why not have all the regular
> users running NM1-1,NM7-7 and cover the state?
>
> 73
> Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>