[aprssig] how to implement 'No more relay' for dummies

[Wes Johnston]

Suum cuique pulchrum est.

Wes


Phillip B. Pacier wrote:

> I am still not in agreement with this plan.  I seriously do not think
> the number of dupes generated by RELAY packets is in any way a
> detriment to the system.  I can say that with proof of how it is
> working in L.A., with the trap digi plan and a few digis supporting
> RELAY, we still cut traffic by almost 75% even while still supporting
> RELAY.  It is easier to understand than WIDE1-1,WIDEn-N, and it is
> best in my opinion.  I am 100% against implementing this and
> eliminating RELAY.  I still plan to use RELAY and will be using it on
> some upcoming events with some new APRS folks as we set up a temporary
> digi in a canyon for some added coverage.  They can set their path to
> RELAY,WIDE2-2 and understand what is going to happen.  To implement
> this as a blanket nationwide change is a BAD idea.
>
> 73
> Phil - AD6NH
>
> Robert Bruninga wrote:
>
>>>>> ramirault at erols.com 4/5/05 1:37:20 PM >>>
>>>>>       
>>>>
>>> How do we reach the (many) folks who don't read this list?
>>>   
>>
>>
>> An APRS bulleting works nicely.  I use one something like this:
>>
>> BLN1:  RELAY & WIDE are obsolete & being removed.
>> BLN2:  Google for web page 'fix14439.html' for info
>>
>> Everyone can help educate GOOGLE to find my page by
>> clicking here:
>>
>> http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/fix14439.html
>>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aprssig mailing list
>> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
>> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig