[aprssig] The path subject again

[Earl Needham]

At 10:46 AM 12/2/2004, Dennis Hudson wrote:
><snip>
>If everybody would knock it down to DIRECTED,WIDE or WIDE2-2 we would have 
>room for more traffic and things will work much better for us on our local 
>network. 8 of our top 10 users are not locals, and are far outside our 
>aloha circle.

         Lately, I've been experimenting with a path of ALL DIRECTED 
digis.  In other words, NO WIDE, NO RELAY, NO TRACE, just totally a 
directed path.  I know Bob will weigh in on this shortly, but I think 
totally directed is probably the way we should all be headed.  I hope Bob 
agrees.

>I'm sorry if this is offensive to anyone and it's a shame we have to keep 
>bringing it up, but if we don't fix it now it will just get worse. It's an 
>unfair distribution of the network, and is preventing us from using our 
>own resources. Please, take it down a notch (or 2 or 3).

         It's a sad thing, but the old BUDLIST just might be where you have 
to go with this one.

         Oh yeah, remote access is a great help when trying to adjust a 
digi from 200+ miles away.

         7 3
         Earl


Earl Needham, KD5XB, Clovis, New Mexico  DM84jk
<http://kd5xb-2.no-ip.info>