<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Does anyone really read bulletins anymore? If yes, what is the proof?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The reason I ask: <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I just saw a bunch of 7+ bulletins come through, pumping up the bulletin mailbox size. BTW, I know this because of a bug in JNOS that causes the mailbox to explode in size (10s or 100s of MBs) when using “mbox fbb 2”. So I wrote a script to monitor mailbox sizes. I ended up going back to “mbox fbb 0” for stability, but the script is still running.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So, I wondered who even uses this stuff anymore. In fact, I wouldn’t even know what to do with a 7+ bulletin. (I know it’s some sort of compressed image, but I don’t know how to create one or read one.) So I checked the mailbox .usr files. Out of 225+ users in our user group, we have about 50 who are “regularly active”, which I define as connecting at least once a week. And in the .usr file for the bulletin mailboxes, I find only 1 user call sign. <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>And, for that one user, did he/she actually read anything? On a regular basis? Or did they just connect once, list the mailbox, maybe read one bulletin, and go away, never to return. There’s no way to know.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>So it seems to me that a lot of effort and RF bandwidth (worldwide) is used to push around stuff that no one reads. (At least, no one around here). <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Does anyone have an real data supporting the regular use of bulletins?<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Michael<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>N6MEF<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>