<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
    <link href="chrome://translator/skin/floatingPanel.css"
      type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I don't believe you mentioned about two
      jnos systems behind the same firewall but may be I missed it.<br>
      <br>
      Why are you not  using 44 addresses  in your axudp link  at both
      sides?<br>
      <br>
      Bob<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 13-11-16 09:20 PM, Michael E Fox - N6MEF wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:smwd0v826eqnmun4cut6ni60.1384653334317@email.android.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div>No Bob, I'm talking about two JNOS systems behind the same
        firewall.   The firewall has to change the source port of at
        least the second one on the way out.  Otherwise, the destination
        IP and destination port are all the same on the way back in.  I
        believe I've already mentioned this a couple of times.  This is
        basic firewall connection muxing.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Sonicwall happens to change the source port all the time,
        instead of after the first connection.  And it works just fine
        for everything but JNOS.  If JNOS behaved like a normal UDP app,
        it would work fine, too.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The point is that there is simply no reason to require a
        specific source port.  It's just not the way the UDP world
        works.  And doing so renders the system unworkable when placed
        behind 10s of 1000s of commercial firewalls.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>The whole point of axudp is so it can be used in situations
        where axip can't be used.  But with this bizarre restriction,
        it's defeating that purpose.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>M</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>
        <div style="font-size:9px;color:#575757">Sent from my Verizon
          Wireless 4G LTE smartphone</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <br>
      -------- Original message --------<br>
      From: Bob Tenty <bobtenty@gmail.com> <br>
        Date:11/16/2013 3:38 PM (GMT-08:00) <br>
        To: TAPR xNOS Mailing List <nos-bbs@tapr.org> <br>
          Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] UDP Port Unreachable - problem found <br>
          <br>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Michael,<br>
            <br>
            You are making a thinking error here.<br>
            <br>
            If I make a link to another jnos system the destination ip
            number is different.<br>
            Also the return route from that second jnos system uses
            another ip number as the first jnos system so there is no
            problem it all.<br>
            Even with the same port.  It is the combination of ip number
            + port.<br>
            <br>
            Those consumer router/firewall boxes are cheaply designed
            and targeted for the average Joe customer user needs.<br>
            Install dd-wrt in it if available for it and you will be
            much happier.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            73,<br>
            <br>
            Bob VE3TOK<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            On 13-11-16 12:35 PM, Michael E. Fox - N6MEF wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote
            cite="mid:009701cee2f2$4ca88a80$e5f99f80$@mefox.org"
            type="cite">
            <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
              charset=UTF-8">
            <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
              medium)">
            <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:windowtext;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:"Consolas","serif";
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
            <div class="WordSection1">
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">Yes,
                  Linux leaves the source port alone on the first
                  connection.  But that only works for the first JNOS
                  system.  Even a firewall that initially leave the
                  source port alone will need to change the source port
                  if a second JNOS system exists so it can track
                  connections to two different machines.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D">M<o:p></o:p></span></p>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
              <div>
                <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
                  1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in">
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">
                      <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                        href="mailto:nos-bbs-bounces@tapr.org">nos-bbs-bounces@tapr.org</a>
                      [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                        class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                        href="mailto:nos-bbs-bounces@tapr.org">mailto:nos-bbs-bounces@tapr.org</a>]
                      <b>On Behalf Of </b>Bob Tenty<br>
                      <b>Sent:</b> Friday, November 15, 2013 11:37 PM<br>
                      <b>To:</b> TAPR xNOS Mailing List<br>
                      <b>Subject:</b> Re: [nos-bbs] UDP Port Unreachable
                      - problem found<o:p></o:p></span></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><o:p> </o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Yes, I
                  have seen that with those boxes.  That is why I always
                  replace the firmware with linux when possible.<br>
                  <br>
                  Bob<br>
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  On 13-11-16 01:33 AM, Michael E. Fox - N6MEF wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">I found
                  the problem with the UDP port 93 unreachable message: 
                  JNOS is (incorrectly) requiring the source port to
                  also be 93 in AXUDP connections.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">When I
                  connect outbound from my JNOS system, through my
                  firewall, the firewall is changing the source port
                  when it performs the outbound NAT.  But this is normal
                  for a firewall.  In fact, it HAS to do this if it’s
                  going to allow for multiple connects of the same
                  protocol from different machines.  Many consumer-grade
                  firewalls will leave the source port alone for the
                  first connection (if it’s not already in use) and only
                  change it for subsequent connections.  SonicWall is a
                  bit more strict, frequently changing the source port,
                  making it harder for intercepted packets to be tracked
                  to any one machine.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Normally,
                  this doesn’t matter.  Applications/services listen on
                  a particular port and respond to whatever incoming
                  connections use that *<b>destination</b>* port.  They
                  don’t care what the source port is.  Firewalls then
                  use different source ports to track multiple
                  conversations so that when the packets return, all
                  addressed to the same external NAT address, it can
                  direct them to the proper place by the port number.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">But when
                  JNOS receives an AXUDP packet, apparently it doesn’t
                  behave like a normal UDP application.  JNOS apparently
                  rejects the connection if the *<b>source</b>* port is
                  not 93, even if the destination port is correctly set
                  to 93.  This is unusual, to say the least.  But even
                  worse, it issues an ICMP “udp port 93 unreachable”
                  message which is completely wrong, since port 93 is
                  definitely reachable.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">It seems
                  the following is needed:  Remove the source port
                  restriction for AXUDP.  JNOS should not care what the
                  source port is.  And, just like any other UDP app,
                  when responding it should use whatever source port was
                  specified as the destination port when it constructs
                  the return packet.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">Michael<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in">N6MEF<o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
                    style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
                    Roman","serif""><br>
                    <br>
                    <br>
                    <o:p></o:p></span></p>
                <pre style="margin-left:.5in">_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre style="margin-left:.5in">nos-bbs mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:nos-bbs@tapr.org">nos-bbs@tapr.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
                <pre style="margin-left:.5in"><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs">http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
              </blockquote>
              <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.5in"><span
                  style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New
                  Roman","serif""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
            </div>
            <br>
            <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
            <br>
            <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
nos-bbs mailing list
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nos-bbs@tapr.org">nos-bbs@tapr.org</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs">http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</a>
</pre>
          </blockquote>
          <br>
        </nos-bbs@tapr.org></bobtenty@gmail.com></blockquote>
    <br>
    <div style="bottom: auto; left: 13px; right: auto; top: 76px;
      display: none;" class="translator-theme-default"
      id="translator-floating-panel"> </div>
  </body>
</html>