<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:12pt">I like the idea of a week counter better than a '20 day' counter. But since we are taking a close look at this stuff, why not just use the GNU C library provided- 'struct timeval'. It supplies seconds and microseconds. I believe there are also a number of helper functions available to convert/manipulate this structure.<br><br>FiSH K6FSH<br><div><br></div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br><div style="font-family: lucida console,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> Bill V WA7NWP <wa7nwp@gmail.com><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> TAPR xNOS Mailing List <nos-bbs@tapr.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b>
Wed, August 4, 2010 10:45:27 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [nos-bbs] Update - Timer issues in JNOS<br></font><br>> NOS start time every 20 days, and create a '20 day counter' that will get<br>> bumped up every 20 days<br><br>Why not a week counter? We think in weeks but not 20 days...<br>Makes sense to say NOS was running 3 weeks and 2 days but not 1 20day<br>and 3 days...<br><br>Bill - WA7NWP<br><br>PS. JNOS will be back on the air full time in a day or two here.<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>nos-bbs mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:nos-bbs@tapr.org" href="mailto:nos-bbs@tapr.org">nos-bbs@tapr.org</a><br><a href="https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs" target="_blank">https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</a><br></div></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>