<html>
<body>
Thanks you George for replying . At least I feel I am going in the right
direction I will continue my research and hope more people would like to
join in and give me their opinion Thanks again !<br><br>
Joe <br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
At 05:28 PM 7/31/2006, you wrote:<br><br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Welcome aboard Joe - let me give
a partial answer for you...<br><br>
On Fri, 2006-07-28 at 20:59 -0400, Joe Landers wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hello Everyone <br><br>
I would like to say hello to everyone and thanks to the moderator for
letting me join this group. I hope I can get my some help here and
hopefully help answer questions when I have the opportunity. First off I
need some help with setting up JNOS 2.0 with linux fedora core 5 or get
some suggestions on what I should use if this configuration is not the
way to go.</blockquote>Not many of us use FC-5 for a platform - it
represents a bit of "bleading edge" and some new issues with
gcc and glibc.<br>
I experienced a failure on FC-5 with jnos2.0e as distributed - but I did
not stick with the problem until I fully understood it.<br>
Fact is I use FC-5 for my test platform under jnos2,0d(something)
successfully.<br>
BUT I can not compile anything until some code syntax changes "to
remain up-to-date" or in-step with FC-5.<br>
Earlier FC-4 seems to do everything and is "more stable?".<br>
However I do NOT offer that as a recommended platform - only one data
point for your consideration.<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I have had experience with Jnos
110m and DOS years ago but I dropped out of it just lost interest but new
interest has pulled me back to it and I wanted to upgrade my system. So
far I setup fedora with no problems I have good communication with the
Internet . I have setup the TNC (AEA 900) and it is working with minicom
just fine. So I knew I had ttyS0 working ok and eth0 working and the TNC
is working . I set the TNC to KISS mode afterwards I downloaded
Linux JNOS 2.0e and I used the installer program that was offered . I
also looked at my autoexec.NOS file and made a ip address adjustment to
my ampr.org address.</blockquote>At this point in your work plan,
you and I have similar results.<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Telnet works on JNOS and linux I
logged in locally and it seemed to work so I fired it up and well the TNC
was not communicating with JNOS.</blockquote>At this point in your work
plan, you and I have a difference in results.<br>
My experience is that 2.0e failed to execute on FC-5 - If you have it
executing you then have gone one more successful step that I have.<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I ran ifconfig under JNOS and it
sees <b>VHF </b>which is the TNC <b>tun0</b> for the gateway .
<b>loopback </b>and<b> encap </b>.</blockquote>It sounds like you are
"close"...<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Well I went to the Internet and
found some web pages but they seem a little outdated but I think I am
finding that I need to configure some files for A.X. 25 well the files
they recommend don't seem to be there anymore and I am not sure if this
is what needs to be done now or not. What I would like is some
information on if I am on the right track and what is recommended today
.</blockquote>Maiko has a pretty good set of how-to stuff on his ve4klm
site - it may be shut down for the summer / he offered an alternative
before vacation I have not pursued personally. If you "...#
diff autoexec.nos [maikos sample autoexec] " and can explain the the
differences for your site, then it "should work"... (yes
I know I've given you the incorrect syntax by using the [bracketed text],
but you have lots of choices how to supply that parameter I assume you
can do the correct syntax.)<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">I would like to setup JNOS with
a gateway with the multi node TNC I have. I would like to also setup mail
service on JNOS and setup a full fledged BBS with the bells and whistles
I use to have . I know this could be a long thread here so if direct
communication would be better I am willing to go that route . I used to
be pretty good at JNOS but with the changes and lack of info on the
Internet I am finding myself feeling like a Newbie. </blockquote>If you
take a coffee break - be prepared for re-training:-)<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><br>
Thanks for reading <br>
hope to get some suggestions and answers <br><br>
<br><br>
<br>
Joe Landers<br>
KE4EUE <br>
Assistant Emergency Radio officer for Chesterfield Co. Va.<br>
Owner: of the 145.390 repeater located in Chesterfield Co. Va.<br>
Advanced Skywarn Spotter Central Va. VCFD0022<br>
Director of Communications for Va. Special Olympics<br>
IRLP Node Owner on SySop for nodes 4407 & 4860<br>
Owner:Chesterfield RACES Mobile Communications Units <br><br>
<br><br>
<br><br>
<pre>
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.4/402 - Release Date:
7/27/2006
_______________________________________________
nos-bbs mailing list
<a href="mailto:nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org">nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org</a>
<a href="https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs" eudora="autourl">
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</a>
</pre><font face="Courier New, Courier"></font></blockquote>Best of luck
to you.<br>
I hope you will stick with it until you get what you want - it has
potential.<br><br>
73<br>
de Skip k8rra k<br><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
nos-bbs mailing list<br>
nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org<br>
<a href="https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs" eudora="autourl">
https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</a><br><br>
<br><br>
No virus found in this incoming message.<br>
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.<br>
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.10.5/403 - Release Date:
7/28/2006</blockquote></body>
</html>