<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.10.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
We have been knocking our heads against a brick wall...<BR>
Dave WA8RSA and I K8RRA.<BR>
We ask for help.<BR>
<BR>
I'm working with a local friend to install jnos2.0e on FC-4 to replace his jnos2.0a on DOS.<BR>
Linux command line "$ ping 192.168.1.31" and "$ ping 192.168.2.1" get response from both ends of jnos tun0.<BR>
Linux jnos supervisor "> ping 192.168.1.30" gets response from the Linux platform jnos is loaded upon.<BR>
Thus I conclude "tun" is installed and working OK?<BR>
But here is a nasty problem:<BR>
jnos BBS "> ping 192.168.1.1" does <B><U>not</U></B> get response from the LAN gateway.<BR>
Linux command line "$ ping 192.168.1.1" does get response from the LAN gateway.<BR>
<BR>
Here is the set of "clues" from our test protocol...<BR>
There are four nodes on this LAN - DHCP supplies two, two are static IP (DOS & jnos ...1.44, Linux & jnos ...1.30).<BR>
I find no IP duplication anywhere.<BR>
The Linux firewall is disabled & SELINUX is not installed (so /etc/sysconfig/selinux is missing).<BR>
The "# cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward" responds "1".<BR>
YET the results seem to indicate that the ip_forward is not working?<BR>
Linux command line "$ ping 192.168.1.100" does get response from one DHCP configured node.<BR>
Linux jnos BBS "> ping 192.168.1.100" does <B><U>not</U></B> get response from one DHCP configured node.<BR>
<BR>
jnos on the DOS box continues to work simultaneously in most aspects that jnos on Linux fails in.<BR>
DOS jnos2.0a supervisor command "> ping 192.168.1.1" does get response from the LAN gateway.<BR>
Linux jnos2.0e supervisor command "> ping 192.168.1.1" does <B><U>not</U></B> get response from the LAN gateway.<BR>
DOS jnos2.0a supervisor command "> ping 192.168.2.1" does <U><B>not</B></U> get response from jnos (I expect this because there is no knowledge of route to ...2.1 being thru ...1.31).<BR>
<BR>
"Access" to Dos Jnos from remote internet is tested for ping and telnet.<BR>
The DOS jnos responds to remote Internet access at "wa8rsa.no-ip.org" from my home QTH<BR>
The DOS jnos does PROBABLY respond to remote Internet access to "hamgate.ottawa.drg-mi.org" EXCEPT the remote user does not receive it (per the status line: jnos gets a remote request to answer).<BR>
<BR>
Because I have been running a jnos on FC-4 and -5 for a year(+) there has to be something I don't remember doing to make my similar K8RRA installation successful. Does anyone spot our omission?<BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<BR>
73<BR>
de Skip k8rra k<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>