<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.5346.5" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>><FONT size=3>I suspect that glibc2.3.x systems work OK (I
don't have one at this moment).</FONT><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Skip, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>I can confirm that it compiles without problem with glibc
2.3</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>(Jnos, without INP3 of course )</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>That is on </FONT><FONT
size=2>Mandriva/Mandrake 2006 with glibc 2.3.5 and</FONT><FONT
size=2> gcc 4.01 </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>73,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Bob VE3TOK</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV
style="BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>From:</B>
<A title=k8rra@ameritech.net href="mailto:k8rra@ameritech.net">George (Skip)
VerDuin</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=ab0wr@ab0wr.net
href="mailto:ab0wr@ab0wr.net">ab0wr@ab0wr.net</A> ; <A
title=nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org href="mailto:nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org">TAPR xNOS
Mailing List</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> May 30, 2006 9:35 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> Re: [nos-bbs] JNOS (any NOS) and
Fedora Core 5 - the bottom line.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT><BR></DIV>AAARRG Tim,<BR><BR>You have just both saved
me from experimentation and doused my hopes in SUSE salvation.<BR>SUSE 10 was
my target distro to work out of my FC-5 dilemma.<BR>Thank you very much for
your report - I think...<BR><BR>I find it interesting that jnos compiled on
slackware at an ealier time can run OK.<BR>--> I use Slackware pre-compiled
jnos2.0d successfully with FC-5 & glibc2.4 (several variants of
"d").<BR>It is only when: <>
<LI>jnos2.0e on Slackware 9.1 uses gcc3.2.3
<LI>also FC-2 with gcc3.2.5
<LI>You compile on SUSE-10
<LI>I compile jnos2.0e on FC-5 & gcc4.1
<UL></UL>that the engineering change shows up for glibc2.4.<BR>I suspect that
glibc2.3.x systems work OK (I don't have one at this moment).<BR><BR>This of
course suggests that jnos"e" version introduced the longjmp into ksubr.c while
at the same time gcc designers were changing longjmp specifications applied in
(recent?) c version releases.<BR>But I'm a newcomer and don't know the version
history well enough to speak to a whole story.<BR>Maiko clearly has done
homework with FC-5 and gotten the same problem definition as I did.<BR><BR>I
see some solution options for myself:
<OL type=1>
<LI type=1 value=1>Find another (old & cheap?) computer for the jnos2.0e
testbed on a older Linux with gcc3.x and glib2.3.x
<LI type=1 value=2>Continue with jnos2.0d until 2.0x solves this issue
(Maiko - please do <U>not</U> see this as pressure from the user community)
<LI type=1 value=3>Find a way to support both glib2.3 & glib2.4 on FC-5
simultaneously </LI></OL>and I am looking toward #3 because it addresses other
issues for the long haul...<BR>Today I have no solution in hand - my doc
project slows down if I choose #2...<BR><BR>Of interest?<BR>see Linux Journal
June 2006 etc/rant: "Bottom line - if you're already a Fedora fan, you'll want
Core 5. If you use anything else, now is <B>not</B> the time to
switch." Emphasis by me.<BR><BR>I want to echo your sentiments "always
something" and "kudos Maiko" and "isn't urgent".<BR>Seems right to
me.<BR><BR>On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 13:52 -0500, Tim Gorman wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE="CITE"><FONT
size=2></FONT> </BLOCKQUOTE></LI></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>