<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.10.1">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
OK - I am over my head and can not repair the FC-5 compile failure...<BR>
It occurs only when ifdefined linux and __GNU_LIBRARY__ > 1 <BR>
<BR>
I have found FC-5 did change to gcc 4.1.0-3.i386 and (buggy) glibc 2.4-4.i686.<BR>
A design change intentionally no longer defines JB_SP etc.<BR>
It sounds like setjump & jmpbuf are modified (may be depricated?) and need to be replaced with __builtin_frame_address (etc..) for security?<BR>
I looked around gcc documentation for a while and did not land on the answer.<BR>
This smells like a non-trivial change for linux platform memory management some time?<BR>
See:<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-April/msg00571.html">http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-April/msg00571.html</A><BR>
<BR>
On the memory subject - jnos log reports that jnos has 3.05GB available memory...<BR>
Can that be intended?<BR>
It could be right if jnos augments swap space by also using free space on the root (maybe /tmp?).<BR>
Come on recursive qsort - I dare you to try to use up 3gb...! (of course I won't wait all night...)<BR>
Thrashing comes to mind.<BR>
<BR>
In any case, Maiko thanks for putting FC-5 on your fix-it list.<BR>
I'll be OK with pre-compiled executables for quite a while since it has sufficient features for my needs as distributed.<BR>
<BR>
On Wed, 2006-03-29 at 09:22 -0500, George (Skip) VerDuin wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Greetings,</FONT><BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">This is my recent experience that seems worth sharing at an early stage...</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">The jnos executeable from FC-4 seems normal in operation over the past 24hrs.</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">The jnos compile "make" fails in ksubr.c over "JB_SP", "JB_BP", "JB_PC", undeclared.</FONT><BR>
<BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Sorry - no solution at this moment.</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I might suggest to avoid FC-5 development until the differences become clear?</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">Something in "#define ... JB_SP ..." has changed in FC-5 over FC-4.</FONT><BR>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">I will follow up...</FONT><BR>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<BR>
73<BR>
de Skip k8rra k<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">_______________________________________________</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">nos-bbs mailing list</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><A HREF="mailto:nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org">nos-bbs@lists.tapr.org</A></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000"><A HREF="https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs">https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs</A></FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%">
<TR>
<TD>
<BR>
73<BR>
de Skip k8rra k<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</BODY>
</HTML>