[nos-bbs] multi bbs with same call, bid overlap, history file, dupes, expires

Boudewijn (Bob) Tenty bobtenty at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 18:19:32 EDT 2020


I do about the same. 

Bob VE3TOK

On 2020-09-23 16:49, Ron Gibson wrote:
> Hi Maiko,
>
> 1) I don't touch my history file. I keep 720 days of history in an attempt to prevent accepting old BID's
>
> 2) No
>
> 3) I expire my areas each day and only keep X days of messages. As long as the BID's aren't modified somewhere along the line then #1 stops them.
>
> Ron
> VE3CGR
>
> On 9/23/2020 4:33 PM, Langelaar wrote:
>> Some technical questions going through my head lately, in part
>> this is me just thinking outloud, but also asking questions, so
>> it would be nice to hear from LOTS of folks how they interpret
>> all of this.
>>
>> Subject : multi bbs with same call, bid overlap, history file, dupes, expires
>>
>> 3 groups of questions
>>
>> Over the past year I am finally understanding a bit better the
>> intricacies of dupes, and bids, still not an expert, but a few
>> things that have happened lately are making me look deeper.
>>
>> 1) History file
>>
>> For instance, how many folks use the history file on their NOS
>> systems, doyou actively 'maintain' or heaven forbid 'delete' it
>> on a regularbasis ? This file is important (?) for dupe control.
>>
>> 2) Multiple BBS using same callsign and ovelapping BIDs ?
>>
>> How many folks are running multiple BBS systems that havethesame
>> callsign ? If you fall into this category, would you mind sharing a
>> bit more information ?
>>
>> Are you running multiple xNOS systems ?
>>
>> If so, do your 'sequence' numbers overlap ? In other words, if
>> you examine the values on each of your xNOS system, how close
>> are they to each other, how much of a 'gap' exists between :
>>
>>    # more /jnos/rte/spool/mqueue/sequence.seq
>>    16792
>>
>> With the present BID limit of JNOS, it's kind of a complicated
>> question, since once we hit 99999 we 'roll over' XXXXX_VE4KLM
>> for instance. So that doesn't leave much leeway for those who
>> run multiple NOS systems.
>>
>> The next version is coming out with BASE36 BID so that stretches
>> the limit to a MUCH LARGER value, so if you run multiple NOS systems
>> it would seem to make sense to stagger your sequence numbers, so that
>> there is a gap of a few million between them (once you run BASE36 that
>> is).
>>
>> Can the lack of a gap contribute to dupes ? Actually can the lack of
>> the gap prevent bonified messages from getting posted on remote BBS
>> systems that already have a message with the BID from your other NOS
>> system, one that technically could be a whole different subject line
>> or content ?
>>
>> 3) I expire messages every so often, like anyone does. So I recently
>>    expired my ww area, then the messages reappeared when forwarding
>>    from another remote system who has different 'expiry' needs then
>>    my own. This one surprised me by accident the other day. I had a
>>    whole wack of @ww expired after lets say 30 days, only to find
>>    them there again after forwarding with another system. Yeah, I
>>    got back all those messages which I had already expired, since
>>    that other system did not expire them. Does this make sense what
>>    I'm saying ?
>>
>>    SO what happens then is that I in turn forward these to others,
>>    without knowing at the time that 'these expired messages' came
>>    back to my system, so does that make me create dupes of messages
>>    in a sense and it spirals out of control ?
>>
>> It's been 16 years since I took on JNOS and I'm just starting to
>> figure out some of this crap now ? oh man ...
>>
>> Sorry for the length of this, but to me this seems 'important' :|
>>
>> Maiko / VE4KLM
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nos-bbs mailing list
>> nos-bbs at lists.tapr.org
>> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org
>
>
-- 

When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change 

Max Planck




More information about the nos-bbs mailing list