[nos-bbs] mbox fbb 2 errors with FBB

[Michael Fox - N6MEF]

It's easy enough to see (thanks to the new proposal logging):

N6RME is a NorCal FBB station that's been a major hub for a long, long time - way before me.  
It is configured to talk to two of my JNOS machines.
N6RME is set up with "N 2" for my W6XSC machine.  The previous logs/traces I sent were from W6XSC.

N6REM is set up with "N 1" for my N6MEF machine.
When N6RME (N 1) connects to N6MEF (mbox fbb 2), N6RME's SID is [FBB-7.05f-AFHM$]

"F" is plain FBB (no compression)
Ref:  http://www.f6fbb.org/protocole.html

Also, the new log entries added in 2.0j.7v confirm "no compression":
N6MEF log:
Fri Apr 08 20:31:32 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) login
Fri Apr 08 20:31:32 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) open
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) forwarding
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) incoming proposal FA B W4XSC WW SWPC 41554_N0ARY 5513
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) incoming proposal FB B JA4MSM WW PIC 25448_JA4MSM 1254
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) our response FS ++
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) no compression, mbxparse [SB SWPC at WW < W4XSC $fbbbid_allww->41554_N0ARY]
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) no compression, mbxparse [SB PIC at WW < JA4MSM $fbbbid_allww->25448_JA4MSM]
Fri Apr 08 20:31:33 2016  x.x.x.x:48183 - MBOX (n6rme) exit

Michael
N6MEF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nos-bbs [mailto:nos-bbs-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Maiko
> Langelaar
> Sent: Friday, April 8, 2016 4:41 PM
> To: TAPR xNOS Mailing List <nos-bbs at tapr.org>
> Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] mbox fbb 2 errors with FBB
> 
> 
> What ???
> 
> As far as I know, N=1 will still let you do compression, the
> documentation says allow FBB forwarding (it does not say you
> can not do compression).
> 
> The FBB+BIN (N=2) is something different (that's what I observed
> when I was trying to get things to work a year or more ago). That
> is why the recommendation of N=1 came up in the first place.
> 
> GUS ? help me on this please, I'm sure you would have told me
> if the compression was not happening.
> 
> I'm away from the internet for a while, so take your time replying.
> 
> Maiko
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs