[nos-bbs] ip-ip

N0MR n0mr at lakenet.com
Wed Nov 24 09:49:57 EST 2010


Thanks Bob,

First, how do I shut off the tcpdump or does it not hurt to just leave it 
run?

I see the following:

This came in when the encap RIP broadcast was sent.

04:33:25.795686 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu > 192.168.0.76: IP
gw.ampr.org.route > RIP2-ROUTERS.MCAST.NET.route: RIPv2, Response,
length: 164 (ipip-proto-4)

This is an AXIP broadcast.

04:30:38.889266 IP vci-113.dsl.onvoy.net > 192.168.0.76: IP
kunk.n0qbj.ampr.org > n0mr.ampr.org:  ax.25 172 (ipip-proto-4)

I did a telnet and this came in.

04:29:51.638836 IP 69.196.157.57 > 192.168.0.76: IP
port.ve3mch.ampr.org.telnet > n0mr.ampr.org.4249: F 1659:1659(0) ack 48
win 2048 (ipip-proto-4)
04:29:51.639707 IP 192.168.0.76 > 69.196.157.57: IP n0mr.ampr.org.4249 >
port.ve3mch.ampr.org.telnet: F 48:48(0) ack 1660 win 2048 (ipip-proto-4)

>From the above information, it appears to me that my ip-ip tunnel acitivity 
is working with DMZ open to JNOS. Comments?

Jerry, N0MR


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Tenty" <bobtenty at gmail.com>
To: "TAPR xNOS Mailing List" <nos-bbs at tapr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 7:17 PM
Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] ip-ip


> Example:
>
> Linux shell command:  tcpdump -i eth0 |  grep ipip
>
> Incoming packet
>
> ipip packet arriving from a commercial address at Internet using ucsd.edu 
> as gateway and addressed to amprnet.
>
> 00:50:46.081461 IP amprgw.sysnet.ucsd.edu > 69.196.157.57: IP 
> 116.231.27.100.10105 > ve3ql.ampr.org.13491: UDP, length 30 (ipip-proto-4)
>
>
> Incoming packet
>
> ipip packet amprnet to amprnet using the relevant gateways
>
> 00:58:21.885056 IP sharon.esrac.ele.tue.nl > 69.196.157.57: IP 
> pi1ehv.ampr.org > port.ve3mch.ampr.org: ICMP echo reply, id 161, seq 0, 
> length 12 (ipip-proto-4)
>
>
> Outgoing packet
>
> ipip packet amprnet to amprnet using the relevant gateways.
>
>
>
> 00:58:21.738032 IP 69.196.157.57 > sharon.esrac.ele.tue.nl: IP 
> port.ve3mch.ampr.org > pi1ehv.ampr.org: ICMP echo request, id 161, seq 0, 
> length 12 (ipip-proto-4)
>
>
>
> 73,
>
> Bob VE3TOK
>
> On 10-11-23 11:48 AM, N0MR wrote:
>> Thanks to all for the words on ip-ip. There seems to be some confusion on 
>> what works and what should work. Can someone put out a test procedure 
>> that we can use to verify the ip-ip function. It would be nice if there 
>> was a test for both outgoing and incoming packets. Documentation with a 
>> screen dump would be nice.
>>
>> Jerry, N0MR
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nos-bbs mailing list
>> nos-bbs at tapr.org
>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> nos-bbs mailing list
> nos-bbs at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
>
> 






More information about the nos-bbs mailing list