[nos-bbs] RIP process

[Don Moore]

That is correct, 
route addprivate 44.135.90.2/32 encap 99.229.246.125
route addprivate  44.135.90.3/32 encap 99.229.246.125
route addprivate  44.135.90.42/32 encap 99.229.246.125


these are all my addresses and yes I have an entry in the gateway process to 
cover them along with the subnet I am managing.

Here's what it looks like at the site
Gateway: 99.229.246.125
Sent By: Don Moore <donmoore at rogers.com>
Password: 4294967350
Subnets: 44.135.90.2/32, 44.135.90.3/32, 44.135.90.42/32, 44.135.90.128/25, 
44.135.85.56/32, 44.135.71/24
Gateway area:  44.135.90.128/25 Mississauga Ontario
Ampr Net:      44.135.90.2 (ve3zda.ampr.org)
AX.25 mycall:  ve3zda-7
Netrom call :  ve3zda-7
Run by:        Don Moore, VE3ZDA
Maintained by: Don Moore, VE3ZDA  E-mail: donmoore at rogers.com
Computer:    Pentium
Notes:
AXIP:     Yes, New Links Always Welcome!
AXUDP:    Yes
NET/ROM:  Yes
Routes:

The 90/24 subnet is managed by the ve3mch (Bob Tenty) gateway.

I figured once I compiled jnos with your new files and changed the autoexec.nos 
file accordingly and then started up jnos that I would see the routes show up 
and might even catch a glimpse of them on the trace screen after a few 
minutes..nothing seen yet tho.


Hopefully that helps

Don



________________________________


From: Maiko Langelaar <maiko at pcs.mb.ca>
To: TAPR xNOS Mailing List <nos-bbs at tapr.org>
Sent: Wed, July 7, 2010 12:52:26 PM
Subject: Re: [nos-bbs] RIP process

Don,

> Is anyone currently using the RIP process in jnos2h ...

Yes, I've been using it for a few months, works fine for me.

BUT, I'm not so sure you should be using the new RIP code. Just out of
curiosity, I looked at a recent encap.txt file (Mondays) and saw something
that confuses me a bit :

I see that the 44.135.90/24 *probably* has a gateway entry :

   route addprivate 44.135.90/24 encap 69.196.157.57

But further down, I see entries specific to only you :

   route addprivate 44.135.90.2/32 encap 99.229.246.125

Plus these and a few others

   route addprivate 44.135.90.3/32 encap 99.229.246.125
   route addprivate 44.135.90.42/32 encap 99.229.246.125

Is 99.229.246.125 a static IP address and is it registered in
the gateways file at fuller.net ? Does it meet the requirement
that I set out at the very beginning of the following page ?

  http://www.langelaar.net/projects/jnos2/ripamprgw/

Just checking to make sure.

Maiko Langelaar / VE4KLM


_______________________________________________
nos-bbs mailing list
nos-bbs at tapr.org
https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nos-bbs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/nos-bbs_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20100707/def49ddd/attachment.html>