[nos-bbs] Missing something more basic?
Glenn Thomas
glennt at charter.net
Tue Jul 18 17:22:13 EDT 2006
Interesting observation...
I saw something similar years ago on a community NOS system that may
be related. The NOS system had RF ports on 144, 220 and 440. I would
occasionally lose my head and try to connect to it on 144. The issue
was that, in those days, the packet channel was overloaded. More
often than not the link would retry out. My next attempt to connect
was on 220, where the channel was essentially clear. The NOS system
apparently heard me because it responded - on 144! Apparently once it
heard a station on one port, it always responded to that station on
that port - even if the station moved to another port. This has the
same flavor as 'once the RF path is used that the "...$ ping ..." is
no longer useful'.
I dunno if this is the same issue - or even if my routing issue still
exists! (that was many years ago and far far away). This is just an
observation that may or may not be relevant...
73 de Glenn WB6W
WAR IS PEACE!
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY!
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH!
(be seeing you!)
More information about the nos-bbs
mailing list