[nos-bbs] Nos improvments, interfacing to Winlink...

Demetre Valaris sv1uy at ham.depa.gr
Wed Jan 26 14:14:42 EST 2005


maiko at pcs.mb.ca wrote:

>Bill wrote :
>
>  
>
>>It would be another big step if we could also use the F1B compression
>>that Winlink, and I'm guessing AIRMAIL, is using.
>>    
>>
>
>I've had a few people suggest to me that since the SCS PTC is already
>doing compression internally, is there really any benefit in compressing
>the data being sent to the TNC ? Will doing so actually bog down the
>effective throughput of the PTC ? I don't know off hand.
>
>Anyone know of any research into this ?
>
>  
>
>>so we might be able to put telpack_node right in to NOS.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm not familiar with telpack_node. I've been meaning to see what
>it's about, but haven't had the time. My understanding is that NOS is
>already (in a way) a form of telpack_node, so why bother ?
>
>Maiko
>
>  
>

Hi Maiko and all,

One thing is sure, making JNOS compatible to the Winlink/Telpack/Airmail 
system will surely boost its usefulness by 100%.  I have 4 ports here in 
Athens (2 on VHF 1k2 and 2 on UHF 9k6) that support  both JNOS and the 
TELPAC NODE that was written my DL5DI recently.
They all work very nicely in my 2 LINUX Boxes sharing happily the same 
ax25utils ports.

Good work Maiko.

73 de Demetre SV1UY







More information about the nos-bbs mailing list