[nos-bbs] Remote AX25 Attach with JNOS

[Andre v Schayk]

wa7nwp at jnos.org schreef:

>>Given AXUDP and AXIP, which would be preferred?
>>    
>>
>
>Thanks again for all the info.  It's making more
>sense and I'm about ready to jump in and start using
>it.
>
>Next couple questions..
>
>1.  Ok.. AXUDP gives me an AX25 circuit virtualized on
>UDP packets.  That's cool and useful.   But...  assuming
>I have a linux box with a RF port AX0 and an AXUPD port
>Au0 (or whatever) -- is there some way to route ALL the packet
>traffic on AX0, from RF, out the AXUDP port so the remote
>system see's it?  This would be bidirectional so packets from
>the AXUDP client would be transmitted.   This is exactly what
>we get locally with the 'net2kiss' tool.
>  
>
you have to use net2kiss to feed the data to ax25ipd but you will have 
to disable the call check routine in the source to have ax25ipd create a 
default route, that option is not available in udp mode (the option udp 
in a route skips the checking for the d and b option).

>
>2.  Anybody thinking about dynamic AXUDP setups?  By dynamic,
>I mean one where it's not configured ahead of time by the sysop.
>A client would "login" with the appropriate credentials and
>establish an AXUDP circuit.   This is analogous to the Igate
>and clients of the APRS world.   Having an easy way like this
>to participate in the network would not only be very useful for
>various projects, but would make it far easier for new folks
>to join in and get their feet wet.   We could have a "rotate.ampr2.org"
>or similar for major network servers and it wouldn't matter to the
>client which one they connected to.
>  
>
Technicaly it could probably be done but I think the trafic load would 
be far greater then APRS-IS, the aprs stream already is to big for a 9k6 
channel even in full duplex.

>73 and tnx again.
>Bill - WA7NWP
>
73 de Andre PE1RDW