[hfsig] 20m WSPR shield for Raspberry Pi
John, W9DDD
w9ddd at tapr.org
Sat Mar 23 14:18:22 EDT 2019
Please check again, there were some links that didn't get updated to the
new version of the 30M WSPR.
John, W9DDD
On 3/23/2019 1:02 PM, Keith Wilson wrote:
> Hi Bruce, and thanks for the generous response!
>
> My power measurement was made with a good 50 ohm load so maybe I have a
> nice hot MOSFET!
>
> As mentioned in my previous email, the testing was with a USB power bank
> battery, and I still have the 120 Hz apparent mixing products. I tried
> a separate antenna (my SOTA antenna) so I was not attached to the
> station ground. (My station ground is bonded to the household power
> ground) So I shouldn't have any way for 60 Hz power to get into the Pi
> or USB battery. Still puzzled by the presence of these apparent mixing
> products. Because they are down 30 dB, I probably won't get double
> decodes by receiving stations.
>
> Last question, TAPR is out of the 30 m boards. Are they still available?
>
> 73,
> Keith - KE4TH
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 9:14 PM Bruce Raymond <bruce at raymondtech.net
> <mailto:bruce at raymondtech.net>> wrote:
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> I have to agree with Bryan (well, I suppose I don't *really* have to
> agree with him, I just want to :-). The 20m transmitter is Zoltan's
> design, but very similar to my 30m transmitter. The final is an
> MMBF170 powered by 5 volts.
>
> 1. The power output is approximated by the formula P = V^2/2*RL.
> The power supply is roughly 5 volts and assuming a 50 ohm load (RL),
> P = 5^2/(2 * 50) = 0.25 watts.
>
> It's reasonable to expect some losses and the safest way to list the
> output power is to say you'll get at least 200 mW. Also, if the
> supply voltage is higher than 5 volts then you'll get more power.
> It's unlikely that it would be *that* much higher; it would take 6
> volts to give 360 mW. Another possibility is that your antenna
> impedance is less than 50 ohms. If your antenna impedance is, say,
> 35 ohms, then P = 5^2/(2 * 35) = 360 mW. The last (and most
> probable) thought is that the MOSFET in your transmitter is hotter
> than typical and gets driven harder, producing more output. I've
> played with this on the 30m transmitter and have gotten power
> outputs in this range by biasing the MOSFET on more. The threshold
> voltage for a MMBF170 MOSFET is between 0.8 and 3.0 volts with 2.1
> volts being a typical value. The 20m transmitter has a voltage
> divider putting 2.3 volts on the gate. If your MOSFET is fairly hot
> then it would be biased on more and likely put out more output. The
> end result is *yes* the output is real. => Watch for the MOSFET
> getting hot. If it does, you might want to add a heat sink or change
> the gate bias resistor (R2) from 1.2K to something larger, say 1.5K. <=
>
> 2. Power supplies - in the words of Socrates, suffering an learning
> are two names for the same experience (I don't know that Socrates
> actually said that, but I like to say he did). I have learned
> through hard experience that inadequate power supplies cause a whole
> bunch of problems, and they're usually very difficult to
> troubleshoot because the problems are either intermittent or just
> not something I'd normally suspect of a power supply. The power
> supplies normally used for the Raspberry Pi are usually marginally
> adequate. I'm very impressed with the job the designers of the Pi
> did, but they cheaped out on the power supply filter on the board
> (electrolytic capacitor).
>
> Now we compound the problem with trying to run a transmitter off of
> the same power supply in addition to running the Pi. This doesn't
> help things. In the beginning I bought a bunch of cheap 5V/2A power
> supplies from China that worked with my Pi/30m transmitters. I had a
> bunch of weird problems, such as the software getting corrupted
> during normal operation. At first I thought the problem was cheap SD
> cards or some problem with the operating system/software. I now
> believe the problem was power supply glitches causing the Pi to get
> confused and do bad stuff. I switched to bigger power supplies and
> my problems disappeared.
>
> My recommendation is to get a 5V/3A power supply and make your
> measurements again. 120 Hz sidebands sounds like AC bleeding through
> the power supply, even if it seems that the power coming off the
> supply is clean. It could also be some sort of interaction between
> your antenna ground and your power supply ground. You might try a
> different power supply and/or an isolation transformer for a test.
> This might be similar to hum problems direct conversion receivers
> have that are associated with grounding.
>
> 73 Bruce Raymond/ND8I
>
>
>
> Bryan Corkran wrote on 3/22/2019 4:22 PM:
>> I had a lot of trouble with power, in the end I bought the
>> “official” 2.5 amp adapter and had no trouble after that.
>> Keith is right the shield is designed for the V1 board hence the
>> little slot in the middle for the display port. I had problems
>> with the shield fouling on the heat sink I’d added on a 3b board
>> so I used a GPIO extender to raise it a small amount.
>>
>> Bryan, VK3KEZ
>>
>> On 23 Mar 2019, at 5:36 am, Keith Wilson
>> <keith.wilson.pcs at gmail.com <mailto:keith.wilson.pcs at gmail.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have the 20m WSPR shield working on a new Raspberry Pi 3 B+. I
>>> see apparent mixing products in the output, 120 Hz away from
>>> fundamental, when using a USB power bank to power the Pi. Since
>>> these are not coming from a switching power supply, where are
>>> they coming from? These products start at about 30 dB below the
>>> fundamental.
>>>
>>> Also, with a scope I measure the voltage output at 12V peak to
>>> peak into quality 50 ohm dummy load. This is 0.36W, higher than
>>> the 20dBm (0.10W) specified. Is this too good to be true?
>>>
>>> Note the shield was not designed for the Raspberry Pi 3 B+ so it
>>> can't be fully inserted on the 40 pin GPIO plug, but seems stable
>>> enough partially inserted. Getting WSPR reports from across the
>>> USA and occasional overseas reports too.
>>>
>>> Keith - KE4TH
>>>
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
>>> Virus-free. www.avast.com
>>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> hfsig mailing list
>>> hfsig at lists.tapr.org <mailto:hfsig at lists.tapr.org>
>>> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/hfsig_lists.tapr.org
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> hfsig mailing list
>> hfsig at lists.tapr.org <mailto:hfsig at lists.tapr.org>
>> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/hfsig_lists.tapr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> hfsig mailing list
> hfsig at lists.tapr.org <mailto:hfsig at lists.tapr.org>
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/hfsig_lists.tapr.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> hfsig mailing list
> hfsig at lists.tapr.org
> http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/hfsig_lists.tapr.org
>
More information about the hfsig
mailing list