<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Yes, the receiving device wouldn't even know the protocol until it
gets the packet and verifies the FCS and checks the protocol ID.
Regardless of whether the device is using a SQL/COR signal, VOX, or
the modem's carrier detect it's still going to register as being in
use. Some digis might be ignoring carrier detect and transmitting
over packets, but that's a configuration issue.<br>
<br>
Scott<br>
N1VG<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/14/2022 4:14 PM, Greg D wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:3747d315-1037-e090-1ccc-4f450ad62543@gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
Will stations on the channel that are not dual-mode recognize the
"other" traffic as "channel occupied", or just transmit over the
top and kill the packet? That would be my worry, devolving to
Aloha utilization levels or worse.<br>
<br>
Greg KO6TH<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Scott Miller wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:733b29ea-7ae6-97fb-2eab-a282ac969dff@opentrac.org">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2/14/2022 12:55 PM, Andrew
Pavlin via aprssig wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:540218820.920253.1644872102728@mail.yahoo.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=UTF-8">
<div class="ydpf111afcfyahoo-style-wrap"
style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial,
sans-serif;font-size:13px;">
<div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">You can't practically run
both protocols on the same RF channel because it wastes
channel bandwidth on signals some (single-protocol)
stations can't understand. We have enough problems with
collisions and hidden transmitters without making it worse
with doubled transmissions from the same stations. Plus,
there are some digipeaters that can't handle two AX.25
frames back-to-back (i.e., one APRS, one OpenTRAC).</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I disagree. The added on-air time isn't nearly as bad as a
doubling since the modem is already locked and everything. Yes,
some digipeaters might not handle it, but you can put the
OpenTRAC packet second if that's not your primary protocol and
you'll only lose the less important one, and you can work on
modernizing the network as you go.<br>
<br>
Scott<br>
N1VG<br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org" moz-do-not-send="true">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="moz-mime-attachment-header"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org">http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>