<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    There was a news item this past week that the FCC was going to start
    enforcing conformance issues with those non-intentional radiators. 
    Fingers crossed.  <br>
    <br>
    I've been pretty lucky here at home with the LED and CFL bulbs, but
    (blush) turning on my FT-847 to some frequencies will peg the
    S-meter needle on my 736R (both rigs in receive).    Oops...<br>
    <br>
    Greg  KO6TH<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">david vanhorn wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADfdXdeS_FveJZnDze57bvijcszhXLO-k+65wgfaPOkX5SQ+nw@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">Imho they need to drop the a and b lines by 10 to
        20 db.  I usually pass by more than 30 without any shields or
        other costly measures and the products I design are receiving
        signals that almost aren't there.  Emi from gopros, phones, and
        other nuisance emitters can cause enough interference to block
        the signal I'm listening for and then someone dies.
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Feb 28, 2019, 7:06 PM
          Ev Tupis via aprssig <<a
            href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org" moz-do-not-send="true">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a>>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <div class="m_-5283168126646090350yahoo-style-wrap"
              style="font-family:courier
              new,courier,monaco,monospace,sans-serif;font-size:16px">
              <div
                id="m_-5283168126646090350ydp9e48e9f0yahoo_quoted_1926190987"
                class="m_-5283168126646090350ydp9e48e9f0yahoo_quoted">
                <div style="font-family:'Helvetica
                  Neue',Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a">
                  <div> On Thursday, February 28, 2019, 1:19:32 PM EST,
                    Greg D <<a href="mailto:ko6th.greg@gmail.com"
                      target="_blank" rel="noreferrer"
                      moz-do-not-send="true">ko6th.greg@gmail.com</a>>
                    wrote: <br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>One point that has not been made, focusing on the
                    group's intended topic, is that the digital
                    communication discussed here is predominantly VHF
                    and above, strong signal (vs weak), and
                    predominantly FM-based.  None of these are
                    particularly susceptible to the sorts of RFI
                    generated by any of the drive trains (EV or
                    suck-squeeze-bang-blow, as one journalist describes
                    an ICE).  <br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>-----</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Hi Greg. Spot on, and I've made that exact
                    point.  SSB/CW/AM on HF while in motion is
                    impossible due to broadband QRM.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>This isn't conjecture, it is supported by
                    personal experience with my Prius.<br>
                  </div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>However, it appears that the APRS list is focused
                    on VHF operation so there's not much traction to be
                    had on that front.</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>It would be nice if the FCC (along with other
                    regulatory bodies around the world) would revisit
                    the whole "Part 15 exemption for mobile radiators"
                    thing and at least force manufacturers to offer an
                    optional "RF Suppression Option" (even if for an
                    additional fee).</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                  <div>Signing off the thread for now,</div>
                  <div>Ev, W2EV</div>
                  <div><br>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          aprssig mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org" target="_blank"
            rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a><br>
          <a
            href="http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org">http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>