<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp654a5fe9yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:courier new, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div></div>
<div>I guess that I can assume that QRM is as prevalent as it always has been. I was hoping that the state of the art would have progressed by now...but with an FCC waiver to Part 15 applied there is little incentive.<br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="ydp751f7eafyahoo_quoted_1060200602" class="ydp751f7eafyahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Friday, February 22, 2019, 10:19:21 AM EST, Ev Tupis via aprssig <aprssig@lists.tapr.org> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="ydp751f7eafyiv2526290539"><div><div>A number of years have passed since I asked this, and I find myself in the market for another car, so I'll ask again.</div><div><br></div><div>Is there a recommendation (from personal experience) in regard to a hybrid car that presents minimal QRM to HF operation while in-motion?</div><div><br></div><div>Ev, W2EV</div><div><br></div><div class="ydp751f7eafyiv2526290539ydp35464b98yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:courier new, courier, monaco, monospace, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>aprssig mailing list<br><a href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://lists.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig_lists.tapr.org</a><br></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>