<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body>I agree. The linear list of available symbol codes is rather lengthy and unwieldy for finding an appropriate code for beacons and objects in YAAC. Anyone have a better idea for how to organize all the options we're getting with the documented overlay meanings?<div><br></div><div>Andrew, KA2DDO </div><div>author of YAAC </div><br><br>-------- Original message --------<br>From: Kenneth Finnegan <kennethfinnegan2007@gmail.com> <br>Date: 10/19/16 1:17 PM (GMT-05:00) <br>To: Frank Knobbe <k4fhk@knobbe.us>, David Andrzejewski <david@davidandrzejewski.com>, TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig@tapr.org> <br>Subject: Re: [aprssig] Digipeater Symbol Overlays <br><br><div dir="ltr">I agree with Frank. I would recommend I#.<div><br></div><div>The confusion is pretty valid; the symbol selection section in the Aprx manual is grossly inadequate; I'll now be updating it once the dust settles here.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">--<br>Kenneth Finnegan<br><a href="http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/" target="_blank">http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/</a></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Frank Knobbe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:k4fhk@knobbe.us" target="_blank">k4fhk@knobbe.us</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:39 -0400, David Andrzejewski wrote:<br>
> My station NEWBRY is both a high-profile digipeater and a two-way<br>
> igate.<br>
><br>
</span>> [...]<br>
<span class="">> It seems like perhaps I# would be better, because although that<br>
> doesn't indicate that it's a two-way igate, it does indicate that it<br>
> is both a digipeater and igate, which T& does not.<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>I consider a high-digi that Igates to be primarily a digipeater that<br>
also Igates. So, I# (digi with I overlay) would be the better choice in<br>
my opinion.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
-Frank<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
aprssig mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aprssig@tapr.org">aprssig@tapr.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.tapr.org/mailman/<wbr>listinfo/aprssig</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</body></html>