<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">I concur Bob.  I suggested the
      differentiation for the Viscous digipeater specifically because it
      DOES behave differently and not known it can drive a local user to
      distraction.  If I'm sitting right next to a (non-differentiated)
      WIDE1 digipeater that is actually Viscous, I could wonder a long
      time why it isn't digipeating my WIDE1-1 packets when in fact, I
      was also in range of a WIDE2 digi that was copying me direct. 
      Until and unless I hide from the WIDE2 digi while still in range
      of the Viscous WIDE1 digi, I would never see it digipeat.<br>
      <br>
      If the behavior is different, then the differentiation should be
      made IMHO.  Saying it in comments or capabilities is nice, but
      that's even more of a free-for-all land than the symbols.<br>
      <br>
      Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Adding my $0.02 to yours.<br>
      <br>
      On 10/18/2016 1:36 PM, Robert Bruninga wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:db38e82f71f0681d0c84df06fe227525@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">APRS
            goal is situational awareness.  Digis have a code field for
            identifying over 36 flavors of Digi.  If a digi performs
            differently than others, then we should identify that
            difference.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">There
            is nothing worse than inconsistent results from things that
            look the same.  Hence, if a viscous digipeater is going to
            do something unexpectedly to a users packet then the user
            deserves the opportunity to have that information available
            to him.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Just
            my 2 cents.</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">Bob,
            Wb4APR</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"">
            aprssig [mailto:<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:aprssig-bounces@tapr.org">aprssig-bounces@tapr.org</a>]
            <b>On Behalf Of </b>Kenneth Finnegan<br>
            <b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, October 18, 2016 1:25 PM<br>
            <b>To:</b> TAPR APRS Mailing List<br>
            <b>Subject:</b> Re: [aprssig] Digipeater Symbol Overlays</span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
        <div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Lynn
              W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:ldeffenb@homeside.to" target="_blank">ldeffenb@homeside.to</a>> wrote:</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc
              1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
              6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">I'm not a big fan of the concept,
                    but since we're in the area and people are using
                    them, how about viscous digipeaters?</p>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I'd make the same argument for viscous
              digipeaters as I will for path trapping (#L) digipeaters.
              I don't think it's a defining enough characteristic to
              make people have to learn a new digipeater symbol. </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I don't understand what we're expecting
              people to do with the information about a digipeater being
              a limited or viscous digipeater. When I'm looking at a map
              of digipeaters, I'm really only interested in knowing
              which ones are fill-in (1#) and which one's aren't. How do
              we expect users to react differently to a V# digipeater on
              the map than a 1# digipeater?</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 6:25 AM, Robert
            Bruninga <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:bruninga@usna.edu" target="_blank">bruninga@usna.edu</a>> wrote:</p>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc
            1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
            6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"
                  style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I
                    agree that L and P are mostly obsolete, but we need
                    them in the table because it will take decades
                    before some people change their symbol.</span></p>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">So let's think about this from a
              forward build view-point. If we are waiting decades for
              people to stop using L and P, what is keeping new
              digipeaters from being set up using these symbols?</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Imagine a new digi operator pulls up
              symbols-new and scrolls through the list looking for which
              symbol to use. He's configuring his digipeater to trap
              >2 hop paths, so L seems like the right choice. What
              did he do wrong here? L is listed as the WIDEn-N digi with
              path trap, and that's what he's setting up.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I wouldn't even list them with a note
              about being obsolete. If someone is still running a P# or
              L# digipeater and local users are constantly asking them
              what that symbol even means, it's all the more pressure
              for them to consider updating their 10 year old digipeater
              config.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc
            1.0pt;padding:0in 0in 0in
            6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0in">
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"
                  style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1f497d">I
                    did add #W as a new one to cover the generic
                    WIDEn-N, SSn-N with path limiting as the overall
                    digi we use today if anyone wants to start using it.</span></p>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">Except that in several other places on
              your website you list #W as "OBSOLETE RELAY,WIDE
              digipeater". </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">If you want us to use W# for
              WIDEn-N,SSn-N,path trap digipeaters, what is the
              difference from S#? I thought we were deprecating L#
              because we wanted all digipeaters to trap ridiculous
              paths, so S# would implicitly include path limiting for
              WIDEn-N aliases.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I'll go back to my original suggestion.
              I think the overlay set should be this:</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> /# -
                  Generic WIDEn-N digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> 1# -
                  WIDE1-1/direct-only digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> A# -
                  Alternate input (i.e. 144.990MHz) digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> I# -
                  I-gate equipped digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> S# -
                  SSn-N local net alias digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:9.5pt"> X# -
                  eXperimental digipeater</span></p>
            </div>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">1#, /#, and S# cover the three tiers of
              traditional stand-alone digipeaters (WIDE1-1, WIDEn-N,
              SSn-N and WIDEn-N)</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">A# digipeaters tell you that alt-input
              trackers are usable here.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I# tells you that traffic meant only
              for the Internet doesn't need to be digipeated</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">X# tells you that this digipeater is
              short-lived and shouldn't be planned on sticking around.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">I think that should be it (I might even
              argue that SSn-N digis should use /# and advertise their
              local alias groups otherwise, taking the list down to
              five). We shouldn't be expecting users to memorize ten
              different overlay codes for when they're looking at a map
              of digipeaters. Lets keep the symbol set for this
              infrastructure simple.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">If you want to specifically advertise
              digipeaters as being path traps, being on emergency power,
              etc, define fields to add to the '<' station
              capabilities packet. That is far and away more expressive
              than trying to encode four different optional capabilities
              in the single overlay character.</p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><br clear="all">
            </p>
            <div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">--<br>
                  Kenneth Finnegan<br>
                  <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                    href="http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/"
                    target="_blank">http://blog.thelifeofkenneth.com/</a></p>
              </div>
            </div>
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:aprssig@tapr.org">aprssig@tapr.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig">http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>