<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Tahoma
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
It's a great system, and I bet it would get a lot more use if there were more bi-directional iGates around. I understand it's personal preference on the part of the iGate operator, but is there a reason it's such a rarity? I have mine set up to transmit, and have had no problems (that I know of, at least). It's not a heavy duty cycle.<br><br>Greg KO6TH<br><br><br>> From: bwebster@wirelessmapping.com<br>> To: aprssig@tapr.org<br>> Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 23:08:12 -0400<br>> Subject: Re: [aprssig] WLNK-1 via aprs-is?<br>> <br>> Thanks is the APRS link to the WinLink 2000 system. Hams can preregister<br>> their callsigns with the WinLink system and use the APRS system to check<br>> and/or pull emails off the system. It's actually a great system that gets<br>> very little use.<br>> <br>> http://www.winlink.org/aprslink<br>> <br>> <br>> <br>> Brian N2KGC<br>> <br>> <br>> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: aprssig-bounces@tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces@tapr.org] On Behalf<br>> Of Jaye Inabnit ke6sls<br>> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:10 PM<br>> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List<br>> Subject: [aprssig] WLNK-1 via aprs-is?<br>> <br>> <br>> I'm trying to understand why my I-gate is getting packets from WLNK-1. My <br>> I-gate is ke6sls-3 here in Eureka. It appears that WLNK-1 (no call sign?)<br>> is <br>> in Halifax, NS! Why would these packets route there my system?<br>> <br>> Thank you,<br>> <br>> 73<br>> <br>> -- <br>> jaye, ke6sls<br>> <br>> How much does free cost? <br>> How much is free worth?<br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> aprssig mailing list<br>> aprssig@tapr.org<br>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig<br>> <br>> <br>> _______________________________________________<br>> aprssig mailing list<br>> aprssig@tapr.org<br>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig<br> </body>
</html>