<html><head><style> body {height: 100%; color:#000000; font-size:12pt; font-family:Arial;}</style></head><body>I've asked before with no answer from the group. Did we ever settle on a national UHF frequency for APRS? I have considered putting some UHF radios on APRS here.<br><br>----- Original Message -----<br><br>From: Bill V WA7NWP <WA7NWP@GMAIL.COM><br><br>To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <APRSSIG@TAPR.ORG><br><br>Sent: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:36:46 +0000 (UTC)<br><br>Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice<br><br><br><br>On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Herb wrote:<br><br>> And don't forget, UHF APRS on 9600 baud works great too!<br><br>><br><br>> Here in the Northwest we have an alternate APRS network on 9600 baud on both<br><br>> UHF and VHF and both work great.....<br><br><br><br><br><br>The several db disadvantage on UHF is actually an advantage for APRS.<br><br>It makes it more "cellular" so there are less collisions.<br><br><br><br>An additional benefit is we can listen to the VHF channels without<br><br>having them blocked by the APRS packets.<br><br><br><br>73<br><br>Bill - WA7NWP<br><br><br><br>_______________________________________________<br><br>aprssig mailing list<br><br>aprssig@tapr.org<br><br>https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig<br><br><br></body></html>