<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV>How universal would this be?<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: verdana, helvetica, sans-serif"><FONT face=Tahoma size=2>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> Shawn Stoddard <stoddard@pobox.com><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> aprssig@tapr.org<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:00:03 PM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> [aprssig] USNS and APRS<BR></FONT><BR>Anybody here familiar with the US National Grid? While I think that lat/long will continue to rule the APRS world using the USNG looks like an interesting idea where voice communications are involved? Most GPS units appear to support it under a different name (MGRS) and it appears to be something that most federal agencies speak or should be speaking. I am just now getting into my research and wanted to bring this idea up in this forum since location information is definitely part of the tactical information scene.<BR><BR>Bob, any thoughts on using USNG with
APRSTT?<BR><BR>Shawn<BR>KG4OVQ<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>aprssig mailing list<BR><A href="mailto:aprssig@tapr.org" ymailto="mailto:aprssig@tapr.org">aprssig@tapr.org</A><BR><A href="https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig" target=_blank>https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig</A><BR></DIV></DIV></div><br>
</body></html>