<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16525" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=381552514-25082007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Thanks
for the reply Wes!</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader dir=ltr align=left><FONT face=Tahoma
size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
aprssig-bounces@lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces@lists.tapr.org]<B>On
Behalf Of </B>Wes Johnston, AI4PX<BR><B>Sent:</B> Sunday, August 19, 2007 9:58
PM<BR><B>To:</B> TAPR APRS Mailing List<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [aprssig]
Original MicEncoder<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>
<DIV>since no one else has answered, I'd say they are... the only issue I can
think of is that of the NMEA data. There was something that changed in
NMEA 2.0 that made many trackers _not_ read GPRMC (heading and
velocity). I'm not sure if the original mic-e fell into this
category. I guess you could use a NMEA 0183 gps unit and be fine... the
aprs data side of things hasn't changed. </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Wes<BR><BR> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=gmail_quote>On 8/19/07, <B class=gmail_sendername>Sam
Guccione</B> <<A href="mailto:gucci1@mchsi.com">gucci1@mchsi.com</A>>
wrote:</SPAN>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=gmail_quote
style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Let
me try my email one more time.<BR><BR>Are the original TAPR micencoders
still useable? I cleaned out some stuff I <BR>had and found two of them.
THanks, Sam
K3BY<BR><BR><BR>_______________________________________________<BR>aprssig
mailing list<BR><A
href="mailto:aprssig@lists.tapr.org">aprssig@lists.tapr.org</A><BR><A
href="https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig">https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig</A><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><BR
clear=all><BR>-- <BR>In theory there is no difference between practice and
theory. </BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>