<html>
<body>
<font size=3>At 10:00 PM 4/4/2005, you wrote:<br>
</font><blockquote type=cite class=cite cite=""><font face="arial" size=2>
Yes, you are missing that Roger (the author of the program) specifically
requested the registration and contribution to cancer research in return
for free use of the program.<br>
</font><font size=3> <br>
</font><font face="arial" size=2>The fact that the system depends on the
"honor" of the participants, should not be grounds for doing
the dishonorable. <br>
</font><font size=3> </font></blockquote><br><br>
Did Roger specify the actual process for generating the registration
information?<br><br>
If so did he specify that it must be done only by a volunteer
effort?<br><br>
By this I mean: send email to XX who will generate the code and email it
back. I am specifically not referring to the actual program that
generates the actual number. Did he specify the actual steps that
must be taken?<br><br>
If not what is wrong with automating the process?<br><br>
I think an automatic process via a website could even be more effective
by providing links to various research organizations. Indeed this
website could be used to enhance awareness of Rogers work and his
contributions to ham radio as well as enhancing Cancer research
awareness. <br><br>
As long as it is not specifically disallowed how is an automated process
"dishonorable"? <br><br>
I do not see anything Scott has proposed as "dishonorable".
Some of the replies on the other hand have been much less tasteful.
<br><br>
</body>
</html>