[aprssig] UHF APRS

[crvickru]

Thank you all for your suggestions from what I gather from the discussion it is impracticable to use this module. All of your comments and suggestions have been helpfully. I am reading more about aprs and it's capabilities what an amazing system. 

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.
-------- Original message --------From: Mark Cheavens <mcheavens at usa.net> Date: 2016-09-27  8:32 PM  (GMT-05:00) To: aprssig at tapr.org Subject: Re: [aprssig] UHF APRS 
defamation?
Or did he deform you....

Only since this is a "technical" group.

Mark
KC5EVE
On 9/27/2016 6:03 PM, steve at dimse.com wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 6:42 PM, Andrew Rich <vk4tec at tech-software.net> wrote:
>>
>> Cyber bully
>>
> Well, Andrew, we've covered this before. It isn't bullying, it is sarcasm, because my other attempts to make you act like a responsible member of the community, including hundreds of answers to your questions over more than thirteen years, have failed. If you don't want to hear any more, all you have to do is to use the SIG the way the other hundreds of people here do - don't report things that are not novel to APRS, don't ask questions a simple google response can answer, and if you answer questions make sure your response actually addresses the question being asked and is not simply a way for you to tell us all about something you have done or want to do.
>
>> Public deformation
>>
> That requires a something I've said to be untrue, what would that be?
>
> Steve K4HG
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig


_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20160927/5d5a0947/attachment.html>