[aprssig] ARISS igated location anomaly/discrepancy

[John Fickes]

 Nagi & group

   Thank you for your response. Well, now my head is really spinning. Was
it just N0AGI's (yours) reported wrong? Because I think I gated 6 stations
on that pass. And is this the same problem as before, as in dropping the
01xc (or what ever it was) or is this a different problem ? Again I thank
you and everyone else's time and patience with this and believe it or not I
think I might be actually narrowing it down to what I'm doing wrong. I
don't think I'm getting my Lan settings in UISS set correct.

                              John   W0JW


On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 8:18 PM, Nagi Punyamurthula <n0agi at n0agi.com> wrote:

>  John
>
> Just noticed this erroneous report again from the pass thru just a couple
> of minutes ago (below are screen shots)
>
> http://www1.findu.com/cgi-bin/pcsat.cgi
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Nagi
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* aprssig [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] *On Behalf Of *John
> Fickes via aprssig
> *Sent:* Sunday, July 12, 2015 1:57 PM
>
> *To:* TAPR APRS Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [aprssig] ARISS igated location anomaly/discrepancy
>
>
>
> Good afternoon
>
>
>
>   After a few days and passes of satellite NO-84 and the ISS I have had no
> reports of bad packets being gated so I'll have to assume the problem has
> been resolved. But if I can ask for continued observations in the future as
> UISS has come out with a new version and I will be downloading it in the
> near future and I will probably try Satgate version 2.0 again. So I would
> appreciate a heads up if anyone should see any problems in the future.
>
>
>
>                                 73 John   W0JW
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 9:04 PM, John Fickes <kc0bmf at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Hello to the group
>
>  My name is John and my call is W0JW. As Alan has said, I have received no
> response yet from my post to the UISS group, as to the problem with my
> gated packets. So, I would like to try and run a few different setups and
> see if there is any improvements. The setup I was running when the problem
> was reported to me was UISS,UZ7HO and Satgate version 2.0 (which I just
> started using not long ago). I have reverted back to Satgate version 1.3. I
> will try running this setup on a couple of passes of NO-84 satellite this
> evening (7/9/15 utc I've never payed attention do you guys use utc or
> local?)) and I would like reports as to whether this helps or not. This
> will actually be the same setup that I have used for quite some time so it
> will be interesting if the problem continues.
>
>
>
>                       Keepin my fingers crossed
>
>                             John  W0JW    73
>
>
>     1:16 Minutes:Greatest commercial EVER
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxU1ZhINaHk
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:52 AM, Alan via aprssig <aprssig at tapr.org> wrote:
>
> I just saw W0JW's post for help on the UISS mailing list, so he is
> actively working to resolve the problem.  He hasn't gotten a reply yet, but
> at least it is out there.
>
> <to KISS mode on the TNC if the software can handle it).
>
> I have used UISS lightly, nonIgate, with software TNCs which use KISS with
> no problem.
>
> 73s,
>
> Alan
> WA4SCA
>
> <-----Original Message-----
> <From: aprssig [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On Behalf Of Pete
> Loveall AE5PL Lists via aprssig
> <Sent: Friday, July 03, 2015 6:02 AM
> <To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> <Subject: Re: [aprssig] ARISS igated location anomaly/discrepancy
> <
> <Thanks!
> <
> <I have reached out to W0JW directly and hopefully he will be able to
> resolve the issue without too
> <much pain (turn off Mic-E translation, again, and handle packets
> transparently, probably by switching
> <to KISS mode on the TNC if the software can handle it).  Good things to
> remember for anyone running
> <any type of IGate.
> <
> <73,
> <
> <Pete Loveall AE5PL
> <pete at ae5pl dot net
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20150714/96e3d791/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 55704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20150714/96e3d791/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 28440 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20150714/96e3d791/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 20174 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20150714/96e3d791/attachment-0002.png>