[aprssig] C4LL/XXX and 4U1EIEIO

[Ev Tupis]

Thanks Hessu.
I will pursue other options.
Cheers,Ev, W2EV

      From: Heikki Hannikainen via aprssig <aprssig at tapr.org>
 To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> 
 Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:16 AM
 Subject: Re: [aprssig] C4LL/XXX and 4U1EIEIO
   
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Ev Tupis via aprssig wrote:

> Yeah, I know all of this.
> 
> I'm simply asking if there are any standard conventions for embedding call
> signs in comment areas.

No. Your options are:

- using the OBJECT or ITEM packet formats, which carry a more relaxed 
'name' of the thing in the payload
- just putting it in the comment as it is, if you just need to conform 
with a legal reguirement. It won't be automatically decoded and shown 
instead of the source callsign by any  receiving software, though.

  - Hessu

_______________________________________________
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
http://www.tapr.org/mailman/listinfo/aprssig


 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20151201/7a76bcbe/attachment-0001.html>