[aprssig] C4LL/XXX and 4U1EIEIO
w2ev at yahoo.com
Tue Dec 1 05:51:16 EST 2015
I will pursue other options.
From: Heikki Hannikainen via aprssig <aprssig at tapr.org>
To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2015 5:16 AM
Subject: Re: [aprssig] C4LL/XXX and 4U1EIEIO
On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Ev Tupis via aprssig wrote:
> Yeah, I know all of this.
> I'm simply asking if there are any standard conventions for embedding call
> signs in comment areas.
No. Your options are:
- using the OBJECT or ITEM packet formats, which carry a more relaxed
'name' of the thing in the payload
- just putting it in the comment as it is, if you just need to conform
with a legal reguirement. It won't be automatically decoded and shown
instead of the source callsign by any receiving software, though.
aprssig mailing list
aprssig at tapr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the aprssig