[aprssig] 9600 APRS

[Bradley Haney]

woops.. thought he was talking about  1.2 gig

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Wes Johnston <wes at ai4px.com> wrote:

>  Ummmm I thought Earl was talking about 1.2meters.... ie 220mhz.  Range
> seems too small for 1.2gig.
>
> To misquote an old movie... 1.2m or 1.25m, whatever it takes.  ;-)
>
> Wes
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Eric Hansen <skyssx at gmail.com>
> *To:* earl.kd5xb at gmail.com ; TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
>  *Sent:* Monday, February 28, 2011 11:04 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [aprssig] 9600 APRS
>
>  There would need to be radios for 1.2G for less than $500 for that to
> happen. And then the most common 1.2 radio is the biggest D-STAR radio there
> is.
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Earl Needham <earl.kd5xb at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see a move to a band that isn't used for voice as much as 2
>> meters -- perhaps 1.2 would work -- and an increase in speed to 19.2 or
>> maybe even 56K.  Of course, my bones will probably be dust before that
>> happens!
>>
>> Vy 7 3
>> Earl
>> KD5XB
>>
>> KD5XB -- Earl Needham http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cw_bugs Quoting from
>> the Coast Guard: ZUT Posted via Blackberry
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> aprssig mailing list
>> aprssig at tapr.org
>> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20110228/472a5ab1/attachment.html>