[aprssig] Pagers as part of the Text Messaging Initiative

[J.C. Wren]

Are we there yet?

Are we there yet?

Are we there yet?

I gotta go...

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Ben Jackson <bbj at innismir.net> wrote:

>
> On 1/27/2009, "Steve Dimse" <steve at dimse.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Bob Bruninga wrote:
> >>
> >> I think that statement would appear to show a fundamental lack of
> >> understanding of APRS.
> >
> >No, it would appear to show you have a fundamental lack of
> >understanding of APRS. Or more accurately, it shows a difference in
> >our definitions of APRS, one we have fought over for a decade. Your
> >definition of APRS is a concept that only exists in your mind, the way
> >you want people to use the system. My definition of APRS is the way
> >people actually use, and want to use, the system.
>
> Children! Children! Any more bickering and I'll turn this mailing list
> around and we'll all head home! :)
>
> This isn't helping the discussion at all. Let's just agree to disagree
> and focus on a way to possibly implement this in a safe and legal manner.
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig_lists.tapr.org/attachments/20090127/113e4ab0/attachment.html>